Commentaries II: Ovid in the Third Reich
For me the final couplet of the poem represents the most forceful critique of social desire ever written in English language. By social desire, I mean the drive, urge and will to reform and re-mould those who are labelled as damned and subordinated. Hill in the concluding stanza implies that God can have multiple meanings; it may stand for reason, both scientific and rational and at the same time it may connote the quite anti-thesis of reason. I hope his seemingly arrogant tone makes alignment with Gramsci’s rather infamous statement that all men are intellectuals. All people do have their own battery of resources; intellectual, moral, mental, perceptual and physical. Hence, no one needs a master or teacher to motivate those resources into utilitarian channels. Each and every individual whether his/her abode is a hut or a castle is adept in making useful allocation of those resources. All reformist agendas are games and those who have manifestly seen the manifest appearance of Hill’s lines would be able to watch these games with different outlook of perception and repeatdness which finally enables him/her ‘to come out of the game as a rebel’ (Osho)!!!!!!!!
Comments
Post a Comment